Main site homepage
Showing 2 of 2 Results

The Book Blog

decorative-image
08/17/2025
profile-icon Brenda Hoffman

 

Caleb Strite, former writing tutor on the St. Augustine campus, and Professor Matt Giddings enjoy reading and talking about books. This week's blog features them making a case for reading Spiderlight and Made Things by Adrian Tchaikovsky

Matt begins the discussion: Whenever we—Caleb Strite and Matt Giddings—talk, we nearly always end up discussing one or another of Adrian Tchaikovsky’s works. A prolific and versatile writer, Tchaikovsky has published many sci-fi and fantasy novels that really wander all over the genre. But there does seem to be one theme that he just can’t quite get away from: non-human intelligence. It shows up over and over in his work, and not just as a superficial depiction of aliens or fantasy races; it’s a topic that he likes to chew on and deeply explore in his work. This makes his work stand out from other depictions of diverse life in sci-fi and fantasy. Consider, for example, “Star Trek” and Star Wars. Most of the aliens in either of those media franchises are merely slightly odd people. There’s no awareness of the idea that a fundamentally alien life form might have radically different cognition than we do (there is one obvious exception that comes to mind, that of the Horta, a silicon-based rock creature in The Original Series, S1E25). Tchaikovskly, on the other hand, wants his sentient species to have all the qualities that aliens do in other media with the added depth of spending time pondering how biological beings entirely separate from humanity would think, see, and experience the world. The pinnacle example of this is Children of Time, his award-winning novel from 2015. While we could easily spend pages hyping that book up (and you really should check it out), we wanted to focus on two of his shorter works that delve into his skill of crafting conscious creatures.

Made Things, a novella of his that Tor Dot Com published in 2019, is another attempt to depict and wrestle with the idea of non-human intelligence. In this case, it’s homunculi—little made objects animated by magic. The setting is a big fantasy city and the main character, Coppelia, is a thief and scam artist living in the slums, eking out a criminal existence in the city’s underclass while she warily avoids the authorities. What makes her story interesting, however, is that she’s got some friends—homunculi—who have taken up with her because she can make puppets, and that skill might allow her to craft bodies for the homunculi’s children. 

I think that Made Things suffered from being a novella. The fantasy setting is described only briefly, and the plot is quite speedy, which is what you need in a 175-page novella, but as a result, the most interesting thing in the story—the origins and society of the homunculi—is given only a brief and partial glimpse. In Children of Time, for example, the spiders who are the aliens in the story get a huge chunk of space in the text, which allows Tchaikovsky to spend a long time explaining their societal development and cognition. In Made Things, that really wasn’t possible given the limits of the story; instead, a brief but tantalizing depiction of a tower with magic that animated all the objects in it resulting in a society of animated candles, paper, rope, and cloth people has to suffice. It’s so tantalizing: “[t]he Folded One who kept and taught the lore of magic, the great and varnished lords of the Woodmen, the polished metal chiefs of the Sculls, the most embroidered Fabrickers, the Candle Kings, all the leaders of the different tribes” a glimpse of a whole hierarchy of little made people! It was a shame, since I really wanted to know about the social class system of the tower works! Why are little paper people in charge? (They’re made of folded up pages of spellbooks, origami style!!). 

Having said that, I still enjoyed Made Things a great deal—at this point, I’ve read more than 25 of Tchaikovsky’s books, and he hasn’t had a miss yet. Made Things is by turns, exciting and bittersweet. I just wish it were another 200 pages longer! I sometimes get the impression that Tchaikovsky is so bursting with ideas that the novellas he writes are just to get these ideas out of his head and on paper. And so, what might have been a long novel detailing the homunculi society is a series of brief glimpses instead. 

The interesting thing here, re: non-human intelligence is that the homunculi aren’t really all that different than humans, cognition-wise. They seem to think the same as we do, which is unusual for a Tchaikovsky book. Instead, they have interesting motivations: the gathering of materials for bodies (babies, actually) and the gathering of magical items to power the ‘birth’ of the new babies. The fascinating and unexpected thing is that the homunculi broke out of their home and entered the world to complete with the humans: “[the wizard] had not meant a thriving culture of made-people to grow up about his frozen ankles; he had not meant any of it, and whatever meaning they could lay claim to came from their actions, and not their mythology.” The made people even have myths! 

Caleb’s turn: Another aspect of Tchaikovsky’s non-human exploration is comparing humanity to those non-humans and exploring what it means to be a ‘person’—sentient, intelligent, and equal. I recently read Spiderlight, which is another novella originally published in serial form by Aethernet magazine in 2013; it is ostensibly a classic fantasy tale about a disparate band of heroes on a prophesied quest to end the reign of a dark lord, but beneath this veneer is an inquiry into what it means to be human and whether non-human beings are equal to human

Spiderlight opens with Nth, a spider living in a forest called Mother’s Brood with his brethren. The opening sentence sets up a key difference between spider kind and humanity: speech and communication. “The words that twanged and thrummed their way to Nth said, New food coming, and he stirred, resettling his legs to take the measure of the message.” As in Children of Time, Tchaikovsky highlights the fact that spiders fundamentally do not possess a sense of hearing and therefore communicate through vibrations in the ground and webs. Tchaikovsky sets this in direct contrast to the humans. Dion, a priestess of the Church of Armes (the ‘light side’), later communicates telepathically with the matriarch of the spider society, Mother, and yet doesn’t believe that she is fully intelligent, hearing “A resonant, female voice, but that was just her imagination gifting humanity and character where there was none.” As part of a deal they make with Mother, Nth is sent as a guide to aid the party on their quest. However, they immediately run into a dilemma: Nth has no way to communicate with them. Their solution is for their mage, Penthos, to transform Nth into a human form. Though an incredible feat, this endeavor is not fully accomplished, and Nth is made into a not-quite human in ‘uncanny valley’ territory. Luckily, Penthos is magically able to impart many of his concepts and his ability of speech to Nth.

Yet, Nth initially struggles with his new form. “At first the new body… had dominated his attention…” Instead of being able to sense every vibration through the ground and webs, “there was a raucous cacophony of sound that battered in through his unwanted ears, out of which, somehow, he could still parse the gibbering that was the way that these Men communicated among themselves.” Nth is also baffled by his magnified ability to see (not helped by the fact that Penthos was unable to gift him with eyelids), and the constant visual overstimulation lends to his struggle to adapt.

 With this foundation, each member of the party struggles with varying difficulty in accepting Nth as a fully sentient equal. A key aspect of this is accepting that Nth, a spider and a “creature of darkness,” holds emotions and motivations that are as valid as humanity’s. They initially refer to him as a freak and “it.” Conversely, Nth himself has a journey of accepting humanity; “He had been trying to think of his captors as just ‘Man,’ the homogenous mass he had perceived in the forest, but… They were individuals, each with different things to fear and loathe about them.” Seeing each other as individuals worthy of equal status is the crux of Spiderlight, and Tchaikovsky expertly navigates the topic. The novella also deals with religious extremism and the dangers of “othering” groups of people into good and bad categories, the message ultimately being that each other as individuals with hopes, emotions, dreams, and humanity is paramount.

We hope you enjoyed thinking about non-humans with us! We’re both big fans of Tchaikovsky’s works, and I think I can say we’d both recommend anything of his to any reader looking for an interesting and thought-provoking time! As always, feel free to stop by the Readers’ Guild on the three St. Johns River State College campuses to chat about what you’re reading!

 

Book page preview 1 of 3. Click to open preview.
Book page preview 1 of 3. Click to open preview.

No Subjects
08/04/2025
profile-icon Kayla Cook

A few semesters back, a student of mine (who recently graduated but had been a regular attendee of the Palatka campus book club) was reading Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein. I’m not sure if she ever finished reading it, but I remember being delighted by her reports at every meeting about what her “special little guy” Victor Frankenstein had been up to since we last spoke. I and several other regular attendees were captivated by her uniquely Gen-Z-style retelling of the story, and I remember being pleasantly surprised by how much fun she was having reading this book because it’s rare to find a student so excited about reading a classic. 

I minored in English literature as an undergraduate, and of all the authors of the Regency era, Mary Shelley has always stood out to me, though I had never read Frankenstein in its entirety. Widely considered a pioneer in both science fiction and horror, Shelley is said to have written the first draft of Frankenstein in a single night on a dare from Lord Byron when she was just nineteen years old. That fact, combined with our book-clubber's enthusiasm for the story (as well as the knowledge that Guillermo del Toro’s Frankenstein is set to be released later this year), inspired me to finally give this book a chance. 

Unlike the student from book club, who was reading a physical form of the book, I elected to go with an audiobook. The one I chose was narrated by Dan Stevens, of Downton Abbey fame, and is an unabridged version of the original 1818 text (Shelley apparently reworked the novel multiple times, and the most common version is the one from 1831 edition, which I have heard is both cleaner stylistically and more thematically sanitized, removing some of Shelley’s more progressive social commentaries as well as the detail of Victor’s betrothed being his adopted sister/cousin). Stevens does an excellent job with the narration, and I enjoyed the different voices he did for each character, which felt authentic and not terribly over-the-top ridiculous, which I’ve found many audiobook narrators are guilty of. 

The story itself was also delightfully creepy and surprisingly nuanced. I liked that neither Victor nor Adam—the name the Creature gives himself, after Adam from John Milton’s Paradise Lost, who was, of course, based on Adam from the book of Genesis in the Bible—was fully good or fully evil. They were both just men of the circumstances they found themselves in. And yet, I was surprised to find that, the more I read, the less I sympathized with Victor and instead came to think of him as the villain of the story. 

Supposedly based on her relationship to various men in her life, including her father and her husband Percy Shelley, Mary Shelley sets Victor up as a self-taught genius and a respectable and sympathetic gentleman before revealing the ways he has ruined not only his life, but countless others, by allowing his hubris and pride to get the better of him. He decided to play God and create life, not from nothing but from the pieces of what used to be living humans, and when he succeeded in this monstrous act, when he saw his creation come to life, he panicked and abandoned him without even giving him a name or teaching him anything about what it was to be human, leaving this “Creature” unbound from any area of human society and connected to no culture, unable to be loved by his fellow man. Victor had a whole life to adapt to the life he was born into, that of a man from an established wealthy, land-owning family who could travel to faraway places and study in universities and be free to do commit such dark acts in the comfort of his own home. 

Adam, on the other hand, proved himself nearly immediately not to be merely the “monstrous creature” Victor believed him to be the moment he opened his eyes. He had no origins except for Victor's lab. He had no memories of any life before. He had no language, no connection to any country, culture, or religion. He knew only what he saw, and what he saw was the man who could have—and, he believed, should have—been like a father to him recoil in fear and lock him up in the lab of his creation to die. It was all too understandable to me that Adam would be frustrated with his condition, and angry with Victor for doing this to him. 

But through his observances of humans following his escape from the lab, we see that Adam loves humans, and he wants to help people and to share in the connection they have with one another; he cares about the hardships people endure, and he has opinions on politics and literature and religion. He offers a uniquely impartial perspective as someone who exists outside any human institution (similar to the way Shelley herself must have felt as a woman in early 19th century Britain, who had no rights except those she gained by her connections to men but who, at the time she wrote the first draft of this novel, had been disowned by her father and was unable to marry her then-lover Percy Shelley due to a variety of legal and interpersonal struggles). Despite his disenfranchisement, Adam’s response to many issues is one of love and compassion, yet we also see his capacity for hate in the way he seeks his revenge against Victor, fueled by a desire to make Victor feel the pain and isolation he confined Adam to by abandoning him. 

I’ll leave it there before I spoil anything major (if it’s possible to spoil a two-hundred-year-old book). Overall, I really enjoyed this one, and I can’t recommend it highly enough. 

Various editions of Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein are available at all three campus libraries, as well as in eBook formats through our website and on the Libby app. There is also a wonderful biopic on the author titled Mary Shelley currently available for viewing on Kanopy starring Elle Fanning. 

No Subjects